It’s an interesting one. I’d agree there could be benefits in some form of the apparatus qualifier system being retained. The athletes did do pretty well as a cohort. Five of the six men qualified, and for the one who didn’t, it may well have been the extra year that did it. Two to three of the women did, depending on who you feel is the floor winner, and the fourth is a reserve.
For the non-nominative spots, there are 4 in WAG I think? Two of them have made no finals, but Iliankova and Guan Chenchen qualified in medal position.
In terms of the Tom discussion upthread, that man sorely needs some media training. As well as pointing out that the US has qualified two to every final and stating that the US are hopeful because they have a lot of room to improve, he does actually have a pretty cast iron defence of his team selection if he wants to offer it.
He should just be saying Simone and Sunisa qualified automatically, Jordan hit every routine domestically and was the clear best 3rd gymnast in the US so of course she was going to be chosen. And while Grace wasn’t on the highest scoring team, the basis for choosing her was that she’s solid on all four events and can step in anywhere, and that was borne out yesterday where she contributed crucial scores on each event. Hope nobody questions the Skinner as +1 too closely, and if they do then you deflect by railing against 2 per country. Job’s a good un. He is going to get absolutely pilloried if the US don’t win, of course, no way round that, but yesterday could’ve been more sensibly handled.