tsarinajen
Member
- Apr 21, 2021
- 815
- 888
Well we’ve seen subs since ‘92, Iordache beam final 2012 for example, but I can see respecting the integrity of the qualification procedures. (Had to get that Tom in there ) though for the record, I understand your point there.
With that said, Listy didn’t have a bad qualification. She was sixth who happened to be the third Russian. I haven’t agreed with the rule change ever. It’s the AA, it should always be the best of the best even if that’s six Americans, six Russians especially with the new life rules. If you give Listy her prelim vault to her other events in the team final, she beat Biles qualifier score. Or move her beam from team finals to the prelims and she’s the top Russian.
I’d love to see Urazova win just to prove me wrong. Regardless, it’s going to be a great AA final. We’re going to see how they all cope with the knowledge that without Simone a lot of them can lay claim to a victory that probably none of them thought they could get here. I’m hoping it brings the competitors out in all of them and not a nervy beam rotations with lots of falls.
With that said, Listy didn’t have a bad qualification. She was sixth who happened to be the third Russian. I haven’t agreed with the rule change ever. It’s the AA, it should always be the best of the best even if that’s six Americans, six Russians especially with the new life rules. If you give Listy her prelim vault to her other events in the team final, she beat Biles qualifier score. Or move her beam from team finals to the prelims and she’s the top Russian.
I’d love to see Urazova win just to prove me wrong. Regardless, it’s going to be a great AA final. We’re going to see how they all cope with the knowledge that without Simone a lot of them can lay claim to a victory that probably none of them thought they could get here. I’m hoping it brings the competitors out in all of them and not a nervy beam rotations with lots of falls.