ArnoldRimmer
Defender
- Feb 5, 2021
- 4,859
- 7,990
There are valid arguments about merit, but they need to acknowledge that we don't actually have a system where Olympic spots must be earned.It doesn't mean anything if you do not earn it. A record of competing at "insert # of " Olympics doesn't have any significance if you did not earn all trips.
Hence we have or have had at various points the tripartite spot, provision for the host nation to send someone if not otherwise represented, minimum continental representation requirements meaning gymnasts who'd never qualify otherwise got to go and the current situation where New Zealand WAG have been gifted a spot.
If Chusovitina had for example been Oceanian, she could've been no better than she is now and qualify to Paris essentially by default. Or if Uzbekistan were hosting and had nobody else qualified. Those spots at minimum wouldn't be any more merit based than a buy 8 get 1 free allocation.
@Denn in terms of career closing, I idly wondered about 2025 worlds. All federations can send someone to the individual worlds iirc? She seems to be on a downward trajectory now, but might like to be the first ever/first in eons worlds participant in their 50s.
Last edited: