The team already had 4 good AA’s, Kocian was not just a specialist, her AA was good enough to finish runner-up to Simone, had she been put in that position. Taking a 5th AA just for the sake of “backup” is not something I would ever do, unless there was no other option.
If I was in Marta’s position and felt Gabby could improve significantly still, especially on Bars, then yeah she was the right pick. But would that fly anymore? People want transparency and proof, actual competitive results, for justification of team selection.
The problem is Gabby went into the Olympic Trials being told she would already be on the team, and it showed. She didn’t compete like someone who was fighting for her spot on the team, and that’s not fair to the other athletes, nor to the spectators who are paying to watch the most important competition of the year. Olympic Trials is not supposed to be a mere exhibition.