Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Interesting, funny how different perspectives can see different things. Did you not see Cal in the semifinal? I actually am more impressed with Florida. Losing arguably the most important gymnast in college in the middle of 2 day competition, changing line-ups and surprising people with sudden line-up spots, they were rock solid for the most part. Having to count OOB, no Trinity and still were right there with Cal, even though Cal was having a lights out meet. I know historically UF has this shaky post-season tag, but other than OU, their scores throughout the season have been the most consistent (high 197s). Meaning at this point, I dont expect UF to not perform at nationals. Can they perform at their peak? Who knows? But I do know Cal, LSU, and Denver all have been much more variable throughout the season and into the post-season (see semi-finals, conference champs.). My point is, unless Trinity is definitely out of nationals, idk why you would say UF is ripe for the picking, just because UF scored a 197.8?Good news for Cal though, this definitely opens a pathway to National finals.
Cal, Florida, Denver, LSU- that one is wide open and Florida looks ripe for the picking to be honest.
I thought Cal had more momentum. Florida did well without Thomas I agree. But, had Michigan State not flubbed their vault landings, Florida would have been eliminated.Did you not see Cal in the semifinal? I actually am more impressed with Florida.
Oh there are always what ifs…but sitting a vault down and the OOB can’t happen at Nationals or they might not make it to finals.And if Florida didnt have to count an OOB or have sat a vault, they would have won the regional. Regardless of “what if” Michigan State would have done. The “what if” game works all different permutations. But I understand that’s your interpretation/feeling of events coming out of regionals
UCLA could win nationals.After all that UCLA went through last year, the turnaround is pretty extraordinary. I’m thrilled they made it to nationals. I’m also in awe of their consistency, which has never been a UCLA strength. They only had 3 falls all season long and those falls came from 3 different athletes, so no individual had more than one fall.
I didn’t say anything about odds, I said on any given day any of the 8 teams could win and I stand by that statement. It is unlikely that Denver, LSU, or Kentucky will win, but they have the ability to do so if the stars align.I dont think Kentucky or Denver have a realistic shot at winning nationals. Great teams and excited for them to be there, but I just dont see them with enough to top any of the other 6 if those teams are solid in their competition.
They will likely try to pair up some meets like you suggest. I suspect we’ll also see more tri and quad Big10 meets.UCLA had only four road conference meets this year plus the Pac-12s, so that’s really not that bad. Maybe they could double up one weekend and compete against both Michigan schools or something.