Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
2018 top 3 were team medalists, not qualification rank.It’s interesting that the first three teams are qualifying by team final format in 2022 and the rest by qualification format in 2023. Last quad it was qualification standings for both years.
My mistake, I take it back. Thanks for the correction. I still think it’s odd to qualify the teams via two different formats. Several teams are relatively much weaker counting a 4th score.2018 top 3 were team medalists, not qualification rank.
I am confused.Several teams are relatively much weaker counting a 4th score.
They went 37.665 in team finals with all 3 athletes falling. Andrade got a 12.966. Barbosa 12.233. Saraiva 12.466.A hit bar rotation would have clinched it for them iirc, no? In the end, they managed to qualify their two stars as individuals and took home two medals which probably softened the blow of missing out on team qualification in retrospect.
Weird to think the only Chinese squad to nab a team medal that quad was the weakest of all 3.
Disagree 100%.Pisspoor management on Liukin’s behalf for a team as talented as Brazil’s to lose to Spain in Stuttgart.
There really wasn’t room for Hypolito, since it was going to be 4-4-3 in Tokyo and had encouraged her to go the specialist route. She easily could have gone the World Cup circuit on balance beam and maybe even qualified as an individual.Hypolito there was no role for her any more in 2018, after she’d posted strong scores in domestic competition.