Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
But then you get this (1:30):She can do Moors, Silivas, 1.5 + front full, and Double Tuck
At this moment, she doesn’t really have many options for clean tumbling passes so the .2 isn’t really worth when the execution is always a high risk. Her DLO regressed after 2019 and I don’t think it was that great then either. Not worth doing a double tuck as it’s also not great. She had a double arabian years ago. And IIRC she had a full-out but was always deep in the landing. She could replace a couple of skills in her Tokyo AA routine and get something that she could execute pretty well with a D score that won’t drop her much.A Moors is silly at this point. A Silivas, a Chuso and a good DLO are all better options. Plus, in this Code she can’t dismount with a Back 3/2 to Front 1/1 anymore without losing another 0.2P, so that hurts her, compositionally.
Nope!Does the dismount have to come after a certain point in the routine? Or is that no longer the case?
Yes.Am I crazy?
There unfortunately isn’t anymore, unless they consider it “Insufficient complexity of movements” or think it doesn’t express the music properly. That’s possible though, and there’s always negative buzz when someone does a 2-pass routine.is there no composition deduction that can be applied for that? Distribution of elements or something?
Or you get this:But then you get this (1:30):
What was Andrade’s FX dismount again?She would have won the Olympic AA with her qualifying floor routine if the .2 bonus existed.