FX EF INQUIRY (Jordan Chiles Stripped Of Bronze Medal/USAG launches appeal)

Gymnaverse was created from WWgym!

Join today & you can REMOVE the ads for FREE!

Status
Not open for further replies.
I don't see a whole lot of difference between allowing a federation to contest if another federation's inquiry was done properly and if the inquiry was correct.

Their athlete also lost because an inquiry was inappropriately accepted--a clearly short skill was credited. Why do they get to appeal the actions of the coach but not the judges regarding another athlete? Both were harming them.

I do think the podium is correct now, but the damage done is huge. And it opens a really nasty door--there will now be someone from every federation timing every single inquiry by their competitors to see if it's even a second late, because then they can appeal on the technicality and get the medal redistributed. It opens a very nasty door.
Well it does say this which is why I'mk
I'm confused about the highlighted part.
Allowing Romania to complain about Jordans inquiry but seem to contradict these rules? Maybe I'm missing something..
 

Attachments

  • IMG_4101.webp
    IMG_4101.webp
    158.7 KB · Views: 40
Well it does say this which is why I'mk

I'm confused about the highlighted part.
Allowing Romania to complain about Jordans inquiry but seem to contradict these rules? Maybe I'm missing something..
this was my earlier point

it seems they can complain about the FIGs decision to accept a late inquiry from another federation.

they’re not contesting another gymnasts score. they’re contesting the FIGs actions
 
Ana Maria Barbosu, first reaction after the CAS ruled in her favor: "I don't even know what to say"

"Wow! I don't even know what to say. You got me so quickly. What I can say is that I thank from the bottom of my heart the coaches, the Federation for standing by me and for continuing this fight at the CAS level. I am very happy. Thank you to my parents, my friends and everyone close to me.

I did nothing else at this competition but to do my best and I can say that I can't wait to get my medal!", Ana Maria Bărbosu told Orange Sport.

 
Well it does say this which is why I'mk

I'm confused about the highlighted part.
Allowing Romania to complain about Jordans inquiry but seem to contradict these rules? Maybe I'm missing something..
You are missing something. They didn’t complain about the inquiry. Jordan’s performance is totally irrelevant here. They questioned the validity of the inquiry ie was it conducted within the rules. It wasn’t
 
You are missing something. They didn’t complain about the inquiry. Jordan’s performance is totally irrelevant here. They questioned the validity of the inquiry ie was it conducted within the rules. It wasn’t
I understand the distinction that you're making. But I don't think the language of the rule is as specific as your interpretation.
 
If Barbosu and Chiles both get bronze, I worry that the Voinea camp will still be nasty to Jordan.
Well the Voinea camp is going to be nasty to Barbosu anyway.

They can’t award 2 bronze as Jordan’s score has been officially changed and altered to 5th place. She cannot be forced to return the medal though
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Gymnaverse was created from WWgym!

Join today & you can REMOVE the ads for FREE!

Upcoming events

Back