I'm speaking there as an experienced fan, but not as a professional judge. When I was watching, the clear podium to me was Andrade-Biles-Barbosu. I would have had four and five as Chiles and then Voinea, but that's less relevant at this point. I'd need to go back through the judging sheets to see if the board judges had it similarly, with more detailed evaluations than I really can do.
In terms of balancing all the inquiries, etc... If Voinea didn't appeal the ND, she didn't appeal it. Someone early in the thread gave a good reason why she might not have been given the benefit of the doubt there. Did the OOB happen? It's clear her heel didn't go out; I have yet to see a picture or zoomed video of the big toe. Jordan's Gogean wasn't complete, but the judges inaccurately gave it to her on inquiry. We've learned the inquiry was late, but there is also an inherent unfairness to giving the last competitor less time to file than the other 7 athletes, and how much should that unfairness in the rules be taken into account? And then there's the issue of how much of the judges' rulings for one federation another federation can appeal--apparently, they can appeal if the judges allowed the inquiry improperly, but not if the judges judged the inquiry improperly.
So in terms of if it was the podium it originally should have been, I think it is, with room for the kind of argument we all enjoy so much. I guess it's a lot trickier to say that it's the
right podium, given all the events that followed.