It is amazingly unlucky (as well as stupid).
Please don't hate me for this. I certainly don't hate Jordan. But I don't think that video is going to make any difference.
Depending whether you count the enquiry from the start of Cecile's speech or the end, the enquiry comes between 47 seconds and 1 minute 1 second after the score appears on the TV screen.
But everything is over 20 seconds off the times listed for the Omega report, which started the clock with the official score 20 seconds later. It probably doesn't matter too much that the times are different, but without being able to show that the start time synchronizes with the Omega system, I don't see how this can be used to challenge Omega timings with the margin so tight.
(If Cecile is inquiring at 47, it seems open and shut. If she's inquiring (?still) at 57 or 59 or until she stops speaking at 61, whether the right starting time according to Omega was used makes a difference. And it is hard to see CAS substituting the video footage of score flashing up for Omega timing).
This feels like a worst of all worlds where any legal response is likely to look unjust. Cecile is literally repeating Jordan's name at 59 seconds on the US audio. What were the chances??