Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I assumed it takes time to prepare an appeal and then to process but that it was on course but as you said there was no definite information yet whereas the Romanians claim their appeal accepted. The latter makes me think they had some new evidence/approach otherwise it would be rejected?Did USAG even file an appeal to Swiss Supreme Court? I know they claimed they would, but haven't seen anything since Aug 12 when they announced they would...
That's correct, I forgot she did bars in Rio TF.Simone? 2016 and 2024.
I didn't include them because there was no team finals in that era, it was compulsories and optionals.I know it was a different format but Strug, Dawes and Miller also did
Jade did not make the same Olympic teams. She qualified as an individual for Tokyo, but she was never part of the team then.It is kind of wild that Jordan and Jade have made the same Olympic teams, Jordan’s competed AA in two team finals while Jade has only competed one event (and did not make TF on the event she came in as OC on), but Jade’s the one who has competed in an Olympic AA final. It’s just weird how things work out.
I write SOPs as part of my job. Errors and bad writing like that make me die a little inside.Yep. All FIG officials signed under that word salad should be disciplined accordingly, if not fired.
And Netherland gym federation should go after them too, because of Lieke Wevers ND in quals that cost her finals.
I think it has to do with a few things. First of all, figure skating technical scores used to be much more subjective/less defined. There were reasons for them but they were also ordinals, and so there weren't necessarily points directly tied to one specific technical call. Secondly, figure skating already marks for review things they find borderline. This built in check likely reduces challenges greatly-- it's probably already been reviewed. Thirdly, it can be very difficult to see exact landing points/timing of edge changes/flow of a curve from a rink-side point of view, especially from one end of the rink. The judges get the best seat for it at the middle and have the additional benefit of video review. All of this probably plays in.A question unrelated to the thread but kind of related at the same time, as a 50y+ figure skating fan and very much a newbie here, just wondering why inquiries are so common in AG and not in FS? On my memory in the CoP era I remember only one occasion when an inquiry (successful) was submitted (about a spin level) at Grand Prix event. The 3rd & 4th swapped places as a result. But that was the only one! Considering how similar two sports are and the judging system and the procedure for inquiries itself, one can't help wondering:
Do FS judges get it right most of time (I doubt that!)?
Do skaters have more trust/respect for judges?
Or it is the distrust of the system and fear of being underscored at the next event prevent skaters from complaining?
Was it always such a common thing in AG?
Your thoughts?
Interesting, thank you, so you reckon if there was a similar review procedure, internal so to speak before issuing the score it would reduce volume of inquiries?I think it has to do with a few things. First of all, figure skating technical scores used to be much more subjective/less defined. There were reasons for them but they were also ordinals, and so there weren't necessarily points directly tied to one specific technical call. Secondly, figure skating already marks for review things they find borderline. This built in check likely reduces challenges greatly-- it's probably already been reviewed. Thirdly, it can be very difficult to see exact landing points/timing of edge changes/flow of a curve from a rink-side point of view, especially from one end of the rink. The judges get the best seat for it at the middle and have the additional benefit of video review. All of this probably plays in.