The stuff about ingratitude, disrespect and the like seems to have died down on the gymternet now. I presume Auburn having got to the NCAA final has seen to most of it. I thought it was interesting though that some people, if a minority, did genuinely think this. Wasn’t just cuuf. It speaks volumes to the marketing of and assumptions about NCAA gymnastics over the years, I think. There’s the idea that the college experience is something innately positive in itself, as opposed to an arrangement between an individual and an institution that will inevitably suit some people and not others.
If we consider the relative ubiquity of NCAA for top US gymnasts in the last couple of decades, with mostly only those who’d have been financially worse off for it opting out, there’s no way that across the board they all wanted to combine university studies with gymnastics done in a particular way. There are always going to have been people who weren’t arsed about studying but did the minimum so they could keep competing, and others who didn’t want to compete or give a shit about the programme, but did it because being ‘paid’ with free education and other associated benefits was best for their finances. Still others might’ve been happy to balance competition with studying but didn’t find the type of gymnastics fulfilling. And this is exactly what we’d expect, it’s just not usually been spelled out as clearly as Suni did here. There’s no particular reason to think of it as a privilege or even a norm.
We saw some of the cracks coming with Skinner, whose evident dissatisfaction said some of the quiet part out loud. Now that process has just been accelerated thanks to a combination of the new endorsement rules and everything that’s going on in US elite at the moment. But I think it was coming anyway.