I don’t think that they use a different pen with Chiles than the rest. I think that Chiles tends to have some of the errors that US judges deduct less frequently (see also Skinner, etc…), which at least means that gymnasts will see the same deductions/lack of across the meet and it shows more because she otherwise has very strong gymnastics. I think her scores improved when she moved to WCC because some glaring frequent mistakes did get fixed, and she started to look like she cared again. The difference was very noticeable.
Now, I do think they should be taking those deductions if they don’t! And I agree that the US facing international panels without addressing these issues has hurt many gymnasts. I just don’t think it’s isolated.
Now, I do think they should be taking those deductions if they don’t! And I agree that the US facing international panels without addressing these issues has hurt many gymnasts. I just don’t think it’s isolated.
Last edited: