But there is zero evidence of this. But absolutely zero.What I do know is that the media here regularly claim that Ukraine are using women and children as human shields, have refused to evacuate them and are using civilian facilities as military ones. So that may explain why the theatre was bombed.
So while it is true that a “dual use” facility becomes a legitimate target under the international law of armed conflict, the state attacking that or those facilities has to have some evidence to show that they are indeed dual use. And Russia has for sure not done that because I think we ALL know they are not.
There are cases where civilians are used as shields – in Gaza for example. But the Israeli army always documents it very well – and even then gets attacked by the international community, but that is another story.
Sorry, but the dual use thing just will not cut it here. Its absurd.
The deliberate attacking of civilians is apparently part of Putin’s goal in breaking the will of the Ukrainian people. Not so hard to figure this one out.