Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Why would you walk on for one year and pay for it when you can get one year of school paid for by another university?Except we don’t know that had things been different, she wouldn’t have walked on
It has been quiet.Might be time to bring this back around to original topic. Has anyone heard what is actually going on at Fisk
Well darn the article wasn’t available.The sardines thing was mentioned in the LA Times.
Who would want to be friends with someone who is repeatedly slurring?Long time assistant coach (male) takes over from program defining “strong female” head coach, fails to control the team and the most socially dominant gymnasts take over and create a “mean girls” environment. Gosh, doesn’t that sound familiar. Except this time, the exclusionary means is not conservative pseudo-christian values.
Yes we do.We have no evidence for anything, anyone has said on the subject.
Of course it is. An athlete’s testimony is evidence.Yes. But that isn’t evidence
Testimony occurs in a court of law, not a podcast. Also, when they shared their version of the events did they mention the Sardines and bleach? I know what the answer is and find it rather convenient for the victims to leave that part out…Of course it is. An athlete’s testimony is evidence.
Wrong.Testimony occurs in a court of law, not a podcast.
testimony of people with knowledge of events is evidence. Credibility is another issue. People hearing or reading the testimony have to make that assessment. But of course its evidence. Evidence is not the equivalence of proof.It isn’t evidence. It is their version of events. We still don’t actually know anything.