NCAA Big 10s

Talk Gymnastics With Us!

Join Today... Members See FEWER Ads

So according to Twitter these Big 4 meets decide the seeding into Big 10s? Saying currently UCLA and Minn locked into night session with Nebraska the next one due to Big 4 scores. I hadn't heard this fact.
 
In the past the Big 5s were used to determine seeding. Top 2 in each meet earned the night session, while the bottom 3 in each meet earned the afternoon session.
In 2022, this was eliminated and seeding was based on NQS.
As far as I know, it is still determined by NQS.

The Big Four meets/ previously Big 5 meets are now used to ensure that all Big Ten teams face each other in the season so that a regular season conference champion can be chosen.
With 12 Big Ten teams, it would be impossible to meet every team in season while also have room for other meets.

UCLA is the Big Ten regular season champions as they went undefeated in conference play.

Right now according to NQS these are the sessions:
Session 1: 9 Iowa 10 Maryland 11 Washington 12 Rutgers
Session 2: 5 Nebraska 6 Ohio State 7 Illinois 8 Penn State
Session 3: 1 UCLA 2 Michigan State 3 Minnesota 4 Michigan

ETA: Unless they went back to seeding according to league record. But not every team faces each other in the season. For example UCLA is 9-0 but had not faced Iowa or Minnesota. So I am pretty sure it is NQS.
 
Last edited:
In the past the Big 5s were used to determine seeding. Top 2 in each meet earned the night session, while the bottom 3 in each meet earned the afternoon session.
In 2022, this was eliminated and seeding was based on NQS.
As far as I know, it is still determined by NQS.

The Big Four meets/ previously Big 5 meets are now used to ensure that all Big Ten teams face each other in the season so that a regular season conference champion can be chosen.
With 12 Big Ten teams, it would be impossible to meet every team in season while also have room for other meets.

UCLA is the Big Ten regular season champions as they went undefeated in conference play.

Right now according to NQS these are the sessions:
Session 1: 9 Iowa 10 Maryland 11 Washington 12 Rutgers
Session 2: 5 Nebraska 6 Ohio State 7 Illinois 8 Penn State
Session 3: 1 UCLA 2 Michigan State 3 Minnesota 4 Michigan

ETA: Unless they went back to seeding according to league record. But not every team faces each other in the season. For example UCLA is 9-0 but had not faced Iowa or Minnesota. So I am pretty sure it is NQS.
From the link I posted yesterday: "Team seeding is determined by the final Big Ten regular season standings. In the event of a tie, head-to-head results shall be used. If there is still a tie, team NQS following the Big Four meets shall be used."

That sounds to me like NQS is the last resort, not what is primarily being used to seed.

Here is their standings page after all three Big 4 meets were completed:
 
So right now we have the following, with their NQS rankings

Session 1 (seeds 9-12): #19 Nebraska, #23 Ohio State, #42 Rutgers, #37 Washington

Session 2 (seeds 5-8): #32 Iowa, #27 Penn State, #33 Maryland, #26 Illinois

Session 3 (seeds 1-4): #3 UCLA, #15 Minnesota, #8 Michigan State, #17 Michigan

Absolutely absurd that two teams in session 1 are ranked above all teams in session2 by NQS!
 
Big Ten Schedule.jpg
 
Looking at the Big 10 schedule and I see a Friday session, a Saturday noon session, and a Saturday 5 pm session. I'm expecting MSU, UCLA and the next 2 will be in the Sat at 5 session? My meet that weekend is Fri night and Sunday so I can hit the Saturday sessions!
 

Talk Gymnastics With Us!

Join Today... Members See FEWER Ads

Latest posts

Upcoming events

Back