tsarinajen
Member
- Apr 21, 2021
- 815
- 888
Flavia’s beam.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It was 4 up 3 count. I thought those were regular E scores.Was the format 4/3? Brazil had two falls on bars.
Nice!Ahtrizi Sandoval (MEX) 13.266
Panama’s 1st ever gold medal
Ok …yeah I just watched both routines. There is NO WAY that Soares should have gone 8.00/4.2=12.200 for that routine. Every single skill was done with leg separations, at least two missed handstands, and one of the handstands on the high bar we couldn’t see her feet to know if there was a separation or not.I’m no judge but the E-scores do seem particularly high for the Brazilians. And they definitely had two falls on UB.
Do you have a link to Pedro’s UB? I judged Miller’s exercise from above and had 2,3 in deductions for a 7,7.
I had Miller at a 7.3. But I am typically harsher on bars than others, it also depends on the camera angle.Thank you. I was close to that panel for E deductions on all three (Miller, Soares and Pedro). I had 2,3 for Miller, 3,1 for Soares and 3,2 for Pedro.
Right, that is what I was saying. Every single skill has built in deductions and most of them are .3.Yes, but remember that, example, if the legs are apart at the start of a Maloney and then again on the catch and then again on the upswing, it it only one time 0,1 (or 0,3 if they are really open) per skill.
It only takes a few .1 instead of .3/.3 instead of .1 to make a 1.0-.9 difference in E score.Okay, we can agree to disagree. That is why there are 5 (soon to be 7) E judges!
No.Do we know if Andrade is working fx at all with a goal of AA Worlds?