Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This was my point. And I bet Jordan is glad it didn’t shake out this way.This also means that had Chiles not fallen on floor the US would have won.
Mmm, when Jordan stepped up on floor there were only about six tenths in it. A couple of staggered landings from Russia could still have lost them the gold. The US did have a good showing on bars and particularly beam, they were only a couple of tenths behind China on the latter which speaks for itself. It’s interesting, the routines with errors were the planned ones. The surprise ones were pretty good as standalone exercises and fabulous in the circumstances.I would also say that after vault, Lee, Chiles, and McCallum had to respond immediately to what was likely a shocking moment of Biles balking and the aftermath. They had to refocus right away, but there was likely some uncertainty right after Biles left and of course Chiles finding out she had to do bars and beam.
I know that Jordan fell on floor but had she been focused solely on floor exercise and not having had to do bars and beam, which she was not expecting if her routine would have been different.
As it was, the US team knew gold was lost after vault and they they had no chance at anything but silver at that point. Even though Russia did make it interesting after beam falls.
Yes, 58 if Jordan had stayed on her feet. So it depends which Simone had turned up. I fully agree though, that would have been the narrative. It makes more sense as an explanation than saying the US would have won this if Simone got 60.5, but she only beat every other AAer by one whole point today so silver it was.Yes but a 58 with a prelims Jordan on floor?
My point is that, but for Simone’s withdrawal, the US would have lost the team title only because Jordan bombed floor.
This is true, but they were in a huge hole from Biles’ vault. 1.700 is nearly 2 falls (assuming Biles would get another 15.4)It still irritates me to think that USA should have been leading after Russia’s two beam falls but because of McCallum and Chiles’s routine construction, they still trailed by almost a point.
After Russia had two beam falls, which was shocking considering how they strong they looked up to that point. But I agree the USA bars and beam was as good as it could be, it could have been a bit better, but it wasn’t catastrophic. My point was that after vault EVERYONE (including us here and likely the trio) thought gold was not going to happen.Mmm, when Jordan stepped up on floor there were only about six tenths in it.
in 1993 maybe?Is Russia tanking beam ever shocking?
I don’t think this is all the way true. Tokyo had Suni (who was barely hanging on), Jordan who was untested for years in FIG competition, and McCallum who seemed out of it the whole time. McCallum in 2018 only scored a few tenths higher than she did in Tokyo, and she probably had more errors in her Tokyo FX routines.It didn’t help that floor, which was an advantage for the US in that quad, was suddenly a disadvantage with judges using a stricter pen than they were used to.
The dance elements were a disaster in Tokyo. She was losing .3 body shapes on everything, several precision deductions for things that weren’t fully rotated. The combo pass wasn’t working all year. It was on the edge of disaster so many times in domestic competition. Then she was struggling with it in Tokyo and we saw what happened in the conclusion.In what way did the Landis set Jordan up to fail?
Yes they did - by perfecting body shape in dance elements. In my view, it’s quite clear that the WTC sharpened their pencils on hitting 3s when before you could get away with a 1.Russia simply got their shit together on FX at the right time
100% this. Smart coaching. Taking the L and moving on.The only two US athletes that left with gold medals were the ones who modified their routines on their own, no thanks to Tom & co who should’ve told several of them to change their routines.
Why? Wedding organisation shouldn’t be a full time job. I guess that’s IMHO but it certainly doesn’t need to be.it’s unreasonable to expect her to train until after the wedding