Melnikova Among Russians Approved for Neutral Status, Viktoria Listunova, denied from Lauren Hopkins

[RichardL]

I am fine with Russia being banned for doping and coverup. Cheating in the Games should get you banned. But I continue to be opposed to a ban for political reasons -- and I am for sure no fan of Putin. But the Games should be apolitical.

Politics is one thing, but inciting war is another. I always love you @JaJa but this isn't about some kind of policy dispute.

 

[Sasha]

I mostly agree with Jaja, not because I believe that sport should be apolitical, but more because the current approach feels very ad hoc. At a minimum, political bans should be based on clear, a priori criteria for what actions trigger the ban and what actions are required to end it. The IOC, to their credit, at least has the former with their Olympic Truce policy.

In addition, the complicated nature of international conflict (as well as territorial disputes) makes it really difficult to avoid having to become the arbiter of what is a legitimate military action and what is not. Is that really a position that a sporting body should be in?

 

[JaJa]

Politics is one thing, but inciting war is another. I always love you @JaJa but this isn't about some kind of policy dispute.

what about the notion that the Olympic Games should stand as a venue where civilian athletes come together to compete athletically and thus provide a platform to foster international respect, friendship and dialogue, even or especially among nation/states in conflict? That is so important. Although I concede that the fact that Russia violated the Olympic Truce is a strong argument for a ban at this point. I do see two sides to this.

 

[Sanzhirovka]

The notion that the Olympic Games should stand as a venue where ....

"Should" is carrying a lot of weight here.

Russia is a state with a government that controls its citizens with near omnipresent propaganda. And that propaganda includes using the Olympics and using Olympians - even using athletes who are minors - to bring glory to the state.

Any AIN medal is going to be seen in Russia as Russia's victory.

In Russia, SPORT IS POLITICS. No matter what anyone else wants to believe.

Look at the doping in Sochi. Why in the world would the Russian government go to such lengths to win medals? Because to them, not only is sports politics, the Olympic Games themselves are viewed as an instrument of poltiics.

 

[JaJa]

"Should" is carrying a lot of weight here.

Russia is a state with a government that controls its citizens with near omnipresent propaganda. And that propaganda includes using the Olympics and using Olympians - even using athletes who are minors - to bring glory to the state.

Any AIN medal is going to be seen in Russia as Russia's victory.

In Russia, SPORT IS POLITICS. No matter what anyone else wants to believe.

Look at the doping in Sochi. Why in the world would the Russian government go to such lengths to win medals? Because to them, not only is sports politics, the Olympic Games themselves are viewed as an instrument of poltiics.

I understand that. I have a lot of understanding of the former soviet union states. I am , however, not at all sure that the way to deal with it is to ban them from the Olympic Games