Livvy Dunne and the no good very bad take

[cuuf]

Man, I remember getting stoned on some sites (maybe here) complaining about how Livvy sold sex and getting shouted down about empowerment and its not her fault creating a stir because men look at her like that, etc etc. Now she makes a comment about scoring and everyone piles on lol.

 

[MaryClare]

Man, I remember getting stoned on some sites (maybe here) complaining about how Livvy sold sex and getting shouted down about empowerment and its not her fault creating a stir because men look at her like that, etc etc. Now she makes a comment about scoring and everyone piles on lol.

Culpability and responsibility are two different things. Does Olivia Dunne knowingly engage in and profit from activities that promote misogyny and objectification of women? Yes. Is she responsible for insuring that people who consume her content behave like decent human beings? No, their behaviour is on them.

I don’t think there is an awful lot of Livvy love on gymnaverse, but I may be wrong.

 

[IratePanda]

Culpability and responsibility are two different things. Does Olivia Dunne knowingly engage in and profit from activities that promote misogyny and objectification of women? Yes. Is she responsible for insuring that people who consume her content behave like decent human beings? No, their behaviour is on them.

I don’t think there is an awful lot of Livvy love on gymnaverse, but I may be wrong.

It's a slippery slope. She can't control her fans' behavior, but she does enable it. That makes her part of the problem.

 

[KristyJ]

I don't blame her for the misbehavior of various fans. They have the choice not to act in a degenerate way. I do have concerns about how she intentionally markets in a way that encourages that male gaze so strongly that the effects travel beyond her to other gymnasts and strong women. She has every right to do it, but I also have every right to be sad about the cultural trends it perpetuates.

 

[JaJa]

I don't blame her for the misbehavior of various fans. They have the choice not to act in a degenerate way.

And Livvy has the choice not to encourage it and monetize it.

 

[rlayt]

@cuuf I think you got your forums mixed up. I haven’t seen a lot of love for her here.

 

[IratePanda]

And Livvy has the choice not to encourage it and monetize it.

Precisely. She is willfully unenlightened.

 

[cuuf]

It's a slippery slope. She can't control her fans' behavior, but she does enable it. That makes her part of the problem.

That's always been my point, you can't really disassociate the two. Her actions are intentional and promote or re-affirm the misogynistic behavior, that's how she monetizes it. So you can't 100% claim she has no responsibility on how people respond to her.

 

[OnlyBeansOnToast]

That's always been my point, you can't really disassociate the two. Her actions are intentional and promote or re-affirm the misogynistic behavior, that's how she monetizes it. So you can't 100% claim she has no responsibility on how people respond to her.

When we all saw the video of the baying mob screaming "BRING US LIVVY!" at other gymnasts leaving a venue and her response began with "“I will always appreciate and love the support from you guys" rather than "That was completely unacceptable, I do not like it, please stop, I do not want people like you coming to see me"...

 

[ugadawgkat]

Sounds like Livvy wants to be given a 10.0 to bolster her own popularity. However if her goal is to boost NCAA gymnastics exposure then perhaps an education in the evolution NCAA gymnastics popularity would benefit her. I have been a NCAA gymnastics fan since the late 80s. I've seen the sport's fan base and popularity do nothing but increase over those years. In the 80s and 90s there were no televised meets and the best you could do to see NCAA gym was to attend a meet. In the early 2000s there was little if any TV exposure and the best you'd get online for a meet was some majorly delayed scoring. Now and for at least the last 10 years or so almost all meets are televised, not to mention the fact that many are sold out. Sorry to tell Livvy this but in all those years when I attended almost every single UGA home meet, my observation was this: Even casual gymnastics fans know the difference between good routines and great routines. The crowds have roared many times in Stegeman immediately after a gymnast performed an exceptional routine. They didn't need to see the judges' scores to confirm what they just witnessed. Therefore to hand out unearned scores to boost NCAA gymnastics popularity would be an insult to their intelligence and do nothing to increase it's exposure and popularity. In fact it would probably have the opposite effect. Over the years when I have seen gymnasts get scores they did not deserve it not only made me angry but it made me think that the sport was rigged. Example- Jamie Dantzler's vault score in the NCAA 2002 finals in Tuscaloosa. She clearly did not stick her vault and yet several of the 6 judges gave her a 10.0. Did nothing but piss me off as well as the Alabama fans sitting all around me. While we weren't trained judges, we knew that an unstuck vault should never be given a perfect score.

Side note/observation: Maybe Livvy also sees the handwriting on the wall for LSU and that the chances of LSU repeating as National Champions will again depend on the best team imploding like last year. The liklihood of this happening are about NIL. Honestly If LSU does not improve they will be lucky to make the top 4.

 

[MaryClare]

@ugadawgkat
Am I missing something? LSU have had 1 bad meet?