Female gymnasts who perform Switch Ring Leap on balance beam nicely

Talk Gymnastics With Us!

Join Today... Members See FEWER Ads

Iminhanoi

Active member
Joined
Sep 14, 2024
Messages
115
Reaction score
77
Among the most heavily scrutinized elements on beam, Switch Ring Leap rated E.

The requirements for credit of this skill include:
  • showing upper back arch and head release and that the back foot reaches at least shoulder height.
  • legs 180 split
  • front leg at horizontal or above

The Switch Ring Leap is a risky proposition both for falling and for deductions. Too many great gymnasts, such as Cheng Fei, Deng Linlin (who recognized as one of the most masterful gymnasts on the balance beam all time) don’t do it.


some female gymnasts who perform Switch Ring Leap on balance beam nicely:


Anna Pavlova:
Her back foot above her head, very few gymnasts can do so.
IMG_1880.jpeg




Alice D’Amato:
In BB final of Paris 2024, Alice’s front legs seems a bit lower than horizontal. But she definitely didn’t incur any deduction because her executive score is too high 8.566
IMG_1889.jpeg





Sui Lu:
Her back foot seems a bit lower than her shoulder. It is unclear whether she incurred deduction for it or not.
IMG_1884.jpeg

IMG_1906.jpeg

IMG_1909.jpeg

bf2457453305432891c32d2318621550.jpeg






Li Shanshan: her back foot definitely reaches above her shoulder height
IMG_1850.jpeg

beijing-shanshan-li-of-china-on-the-balance-beam-during-qualification-for-the-womens-artistic.jpg

IMG_1980.jpeg

chinas-li-shanshan-competes-in-the-wome.webp




(Cheng Fei and Deng Linlin don’t do Switch Ring Leap on beam)



Flavia Saraiva
Despite Flavia doesn’t win Olympic gold medal. She now recognized as one of the most masterful balance beam workers.
gymnastics-artistic-oly-paris-2024.webp



Rebeca Andrade
Paris 2024 bb final
artistic-gymnastics-olympic-games-paris-2024-day-10.webp




Tang Xijing: her back foot seems a bit lower than her shoulder
IMG_1915.jpeg

IMG_1918.jpeg


(Guan Chenchen don’t do it)




Koko Tsurumi
koko-tsurumi-jpn-august-19-2008-artistic-gymnastics-beijing-2008-olympic-B7XE99.jpg





Urara Ashikawa: The Switch Ring Leap is a risky proposition for falling/balance check. In BB final of Olympic 2020. Urara Ashikawa made balance check after did Switch Ring Leap. It probably costed her first Olympic medal.

Despite Urara Ashikawa did not medal in Olympic, she’s truly a great balance beam worker.
IMG_1974.jpeg



In qualifications, she done better
gymnastics-artistic-olympics-day-2.webp
 
Last edited:
When Nastia Liukin did Switch Ring Leaps in Olympic 2008! Her head was strangely very high.

It is unclear whether she was given any deduction or not? (Probably not, her executive score away too high).

IMG_1986.jpeg

IMG_1988.jpeg

IMG_1987.jpeg




Other gymnasts always showing upper back arch & release of head when they doing Switch Ring Leaps. Such as Anna Pavlova, Li ShanShan, Koko Tsurumi (who compete in Olympic 2008 as well)
IMG_1989.jpeg

IMG_1980.jpeg

IMG_1993.jpeg

koko-tsurumi-jpn-august-19-2008-artistic-gymnastics-beijing-2008-olympic-B7XE99.jpg
 
Last edited:
Nastia Liukin has the most technically accurate ring position. Anna Pavlova is throwing her head further back in an attempt to pull her fore leg up, which she struggles with
 
Nastia Liukin has the most technically accurate ring position. Anna Pavlova is throwing her head further back in an attempt to pull her fore leg up, which she struggles with
Nastia Liukin not showing arch due her head was too high
 
The 2006-2008 code had different requirements for the position. That said I believe Nastia's leaps would be credited now, as well. Her foot is at forehead height and she does show head release. You don't have to have your head hit your calf.
 
The 2006-2008 code had different requirements for the position. That said I believe Nastia's leaps would be credited now, as well. Her foot is at forehead height and she does show head release. You don't have to have your head hit your calf.
Her back looks a bit straight
Nastia Liukin has the most technically accurate ring position. Anna Pavlova is throwing her head further back in an attempt to pull her fore leg up, which she struggles with
every other gymnast to so
IMG_1888.jpeg


gymnastics-artistic-oly-paris-2024.webp
 
Nastia Liukin not showing arch due her head was too high
Her head isn’t too high. This is what a ring position is actually supposed to look like.

She shows greater range and control than the other 2 examples. Both of whom don’t achieve enough “over fore” to really call it a ring. They are using their backs to try to achieve it. It is an easy cheat, if you like.

Both feet should be close to the same height off the floor as possible.
 
Last edited:
Nastia’s doesn’t only look different, it is performed with a completely different technique, as were her leaps on FX. Why? Well I think it’s unlikely she was taught those by her father
 
Likely taught by her mother, Nastia's execution on leaps was very rhythmic like, IMO.
 
Likely taught by her mother, Nastia's execution on leaps was very rhythmic like, IMO.
Yes and her technique is very rhythmic too. Having that person in your coaching set up really makes a difference. Natalia Pavlova had been technical dance/compulsories assistant to Nadezhda Maslennikova. They produced Oksana Averkova together and also coached Olga Chudina for a while. When Natalia left in 1987 to have children, she wasn’t replaced and didn’t return until Anna started training at a higher level, around 1996. The gymnast that Nadezhda produced on her own during that period? Elena Zamolodchikova.

Most gymnasts who perform a switch ring on beam, need the switch, because it generates their position. A standard ring leap would actually be harder for them, because the technique is wrong.

It’s like when you see Shawn Johnson’s beam acro. The technique is all wrong.
 
Gabby Douglas’s switch ring leap was very similar to Nastia’s
IMG_1998.jpeg

IMG_2001.jpeg

images
 
Last edited:
Nastia Liukin has the most technically accurate ring position. Anna Pavlova is throwing her head further back in an attempt to pull her fore leg up, which she struggles with
IMG_2003.jpeg

Nastia didn’t show upper back arch



The right switch ring leap, according to fly high channel
IMG_2004.jpeg
 
Eaker clearly shows sufficient upper back arch. That isn’t what’s wrong with the leap!

It is the head and shoulders that should be released, not the back.
 
Eaker clearly shows sufficient upper back arch. That isn’t what’s wrong with the leap!

It is the head and shoulders that should be released, not the back.
But fly high channel say no (x) (in 01:10)
 
Eaker is a poor example. Judges were on both sides of the fence with her. Some competitions she would receive credit and then some competitions she wouldn't. Especially the case was in 2019 when her initial beam routine received credit and then once the inquiry went in, the judges devalued. Some judges saw her as correctly executing her leaps and some judges saw opposite.
 
Also, the expectations from the WTC about what constitutes an acceptable ring position have changed significantly over the years. Eaker's would have been fine in 2008. Heck, it would have been mostly fine through 2016.

The fault lies with the WTC, as is so often the case. As Denn likes to say, the rules are so ridiculously busybody. What the code asks for now is essentially a Yang Bo with a slightly bent leg. With the amount of arch being demanded, along with the foot being at or above crown (rather than just at head height), I believe almost anyone showing a classic ring position would be hit with a downgrade.

Finally, Al Fong remains a fucking idiot. Such appallingly bad routine construction. Although Valeri gave him a run for his money with Gabby's routine construction this year.
 
@MaryClare I would assume a dance teacher like yourself would be very helpful as well in learning to do body shapes and positioning correctly.
 
@MaryClare I would assume a dance teacher like yourself would be very helpful as well in learning to do body shapes and positioning correctly.
We don’t do much dance, someone else does the ballet work. Officially we are known as technical trainer. Our job basically is to ensure the gymnasts have the necessary requisite skills and abilities to do the elements their main coach wants (and also to score highly in national compulsories). Basically the boring shit that no one wants to have to spend their time on.

I mostly do leaps, jumps, spins and anything flexibility related as that’s my background. If you’ve a gymnast who needs to correct her front handspring technique in order to progress her forward tumbling, I am not your girl.
 

Talk Gymnastics With Us!

Join Today... Members See FEWER Ads

Upcoming events

Back