I’m not equating them. But I am comparing them. They’re not in the same league at all. But GMF was apparently not simply “walking around the village” and if she was training, it was to gain an advantage by going against the rules.
And just like plenty of innocent Russian atheltes suffered bans, GMF probably should be sent away too. Not because state-sponsored doping is equatable to a coaching pass, but because if The Powers That Be do not see how their stupid actions impact their medals chances, they’ll never change.
And what happpens if GMF (and I like her gymnastics by the way), allowed to train with the team, is then suddenly needed for the team? When some other country’s alternate is also needed in competition, but did not have the chance to train with the team from the start? Is her team really going to care that BG had to pay a fine? What if BG barely edges them in the team final? Would they have a right to say “but wait, that’s not fair!”?
So, just as banning scores, if not hundreds of innocent Russian athletes is fair in response to state sponsored doping (big punishment for big crime) sending home one gymnast who was likely not going to compete anyways, is imo a fair response to giving her a fradulent accreditation (small punishment for small crime).
Does that make sense?
EDIT: If the paperworks shows who applied for her coach’s accreditation and that person also has an accreditation, then that person/persons should also be sent home.