I don’t think the salient question is “what do think elite gymnasts should be eating”… (Though, I am curious how it is you got the inside scoop on the personal/home lives of enough American and British gymnasts to feel comfortable making that type of sweeping statement about their diets). Rather, the entire culture of reaction to post-USAG abuse, etc., has been a paradigm shift toward believing, or at the very minimum, taking seriously the claims these young women have levied. Saying “I doubt” and “I remain convinced” is merely a reflection of your own beliefs and assumptions, unless you truly have first-hand testimony from the ranch.
And then, it’s almost hard to conjure up a more cliched attitude than “this TikTok entitlement to do whatever you want”, as if that were even remotely germane to the personalities of these super deferential, super type-A, super dedicated young athletes who have to come up with personalized learning plans to balance school work with 40 hour training weeks. But it’s very much in line with the retrograde attitudes of USAG admin/coaching staff, and I think something of a generational shake-up is necessary to evolve beyond that point of view which simultaneously built a sports culture that centered its resources and energies on teenage girls while condescending and belittling their points of view.
Now, look – I don’t doubt that a bit of teenage cynicism might have creeped into the broader discourse. And I don’t doubt that some gymnasts have shit diets, though I hardly see the point in trying to exercise control during a weeklong training camp, as if that’s going to radically alter her physiology. Nor do I think that Kelly Hill offering some candid commentary that goes against the grain is something that should be wholesale disqualifying from a leadership position. But she should be aware of the optics of what she’s communicating publicly. Which is to say, if she had been a super vocal advocate for justice for say, the dozens of sex abuse survivors, she might have earned enough social capital to afford a few ‘counterpoint’ or ‘balance’-type comments. But if defending the cafeteria food of this rural Texas ranch is her first impulse for speaking up – well that’s obviously gonna create a negative perception, regardless of whether she’s right or not.