Idk, I'm kinda neutral. I definitely agree with perhaps changing bonuses and such to incentivize more creative bar routines and away from 2 pass floor routines. But I would consider that a different issue than the judging. I get the arguments about scoring and seeding, I just don't know that it makes that much of a difference in the end. The biggest difference is if you are hosting and are home for regionals which isn't impacted by scores. I think all of us have a pretty good eye test of where teams are regardless of scores and there are very few circumstances that I can recall where one team was clearly better than another and lost because of judging. I just try not to get too caught up in over/under scoring, its an exercise in frustration.
