Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Again. schools are already operating under the settlement agreement. Before the judge even created the initial delay she said everything was acceptable to her to approve EXCEPT the grandfathering. So everything else is/has been moving forward. The NCAA has put together the oversight board for NIL, schools are firing and adjusting staff accordingly. I think the only potential delay will be the grandfathering portion.I just read something today that the judge extended the date now to June 26th ( could be wrong by a few days )... So that really puts it VERY close to the deadline! I agree that they do not want this to go to trial. So if they keep pushing it I am assuming they will have to delay parts of it for sure. It just seems clumsy to cut it so close to training season etc..
Those changes were related to sexual harassment claims, at the least the ones that I know of. Which of these changes relate to sports (aside from those involving trans athletes)?Ya, the Trump admin did eliminate the rules around Title IX and protections for accusers, making it more difficult for women (and some men) to come forward and pursue claims. These rules were put in place by Biden and reverted back by Trump.
Title IX all falls under the same civil rights umbrella that broadly means equal access to education for men and women. That is why sexual harassment gets Title IX scrutiny because if women or men feel unsafe to attend classes then it is no longer equal access. When the Trump admin does away with regulations affording protections to the accuser they are signaling how they view the application of Title IX and civil rights. Given this response (in my opinion) it will be unlikely that the Admin will respond if some athletic programs are out of balance in regards to Title IX. In other words, relief for claimants will not come from the federal government, which has the ability to punish schools for being non-compliant. Relief could only come from the courts on the basis of a civil rights claim.Those changes were related to sexual harassment claims, at the least the ones that I know of. Which of these changes relate to sports (aside from those involving trans athletes)?
I kind of wish athletics were not directly part of the colleges and universities.I just know if they take this case to trial, college athletics as we know it will be over
I strongly agree with this. And I think this whole thing is going to be a disaster and likely destroy NCAA.I kind of wish athletics were not directly part of the colleges and universities.
It's too complicated. I wish it was separate. The athletes can get paid whatever they want and the colleges can focus on academics.
Lawsuits are what institutions fear most. No school has ever lost federal funding for being non-compliant with Title IX—it has never happened. Title IX wasn’t truly effective until individuals were able to sue for monetary damages, and that is likely to influence some decisions.Relief could only come from the courts on the basis of a civil rights claim.
That is how it is in every other country. The United States is an anomaly. There are some intercollegiate sports in other countries. Japan has some (Uchimura was a college gymnast), but it's nothing like the big $ and cultural thing it is in the US.It's too complicated. I wish it was separate. The athletes can get paid whatever they want and the colleges can focus on academics.