Warning about US WAG program.

Gymnaverse was created from WWgym!

Join today & you can REMOVE the ads for FREE!

Joined
Jan 31, 2021
Messages
513
Reaction score
693
No, it isn't that they are falling apart. They are less good than they were, that's all.

It's that people have short memories. Because they aren't pulverizing the other teams like they have in the past, there could be a slide back into some of the habits of the Karolyi Era, because maybe it wasn't actually wasn't so bad and they were winning.

Exhibit A - I got this from a College Gym FB Group. It's supposedly from the Skating Lesson. I did not write this


"The pendulum has swung. Cancel culture has had its impact on gymnastics. And this time, the casualty is the athletes.
USA Gymnastics is famous, infamous and notorious. It also carried itself out of the gymnastics wilderness multiple times to become unbelievably successful. And now they are back in the wilderness - just as they were starting to climb out.
The 2025 World Gymnastics Team for the USA is very talented. It is why they were chosen over the inexperienced newcomers. And if you look at the results, you could blame the leadership, you could chalk it up to a bad day, or you could look at the very loud, hypocritical online culture that has helped, hurt, skewed and paralyzed coaches and the athletes they are failing.
Half of Team USA are Florida Gators. Both of Florida’s top coaches accompanied the team to Indonesia. And yet, Team USA failed. Just as Florida has failed to win an NCAA Gymnastics Championship ever since Rhonda Faehn left despite having the most talented roster of the last decade.
When is a coach pushing? When is a coach guiding? When is a coach being abusive? These are all questions that gymnastics has attempted to answer over the last decade. We know that Martha Karolyi was abusive on an unprecedented level. We can always quietly acknowledge that she was strategic, cunning, intuitive and a visionary.
MyKayla Skinner was canceled by Simone Biles for saying something that was partially true - she also lacked self awareness, appeared bitter, and was tremendously inarticulate.
What MyKayla Skinner started saying about the national team camps has been discussed by countless coaches if you talk to anyone involved in gymnastics at the elite or collegiate level.
During the Martha Karolyi era, the pressure to perform at camp was paramount. If you watched the recent USA Gymnastics Pre-Worlds Puff Piece, the camps are unrecognizable. And before you attempt to say that I am arguing for a return to starvation and abuse, I’m not. I’m advocating for a return to the middle.
When USA Gymnastics got rid of Valeri Liukin and the Karolyi Ranch, they also got rid of many of the standards that were key to the success of the program. When was the last time you saw a video of the national team doing the famous national team warm up with the running and conditioning? When was the last time you saw the gymnast competing in physical abilities testing? If you talk to those close to the game, they will say that Simone Biles didn’t want to run as her body got older, so no one had to.
But Simone Biles was raised under the standards of Martha Karolyi and Valeri Liukin. She is also experienced and unbelievably talented. Most members of Team USA at Worlds were guided by Valeri and that system.
In private, people argue that Valeri is far better as a teacher than as a personal coach. Like the Karolyis, he certainly can be a visionary - and he can also injure athletes. And while some would argue about his routine construction on uneven bars or his vault technique, he is credited for guiding coaches to be better at their craft.
If you watch videos of podium training, Chellsie Memmel is kind and supportive. She knows the code and is compassionate. But there doesn’t appear to be any incentive to perform well or consequences for performing poorly. As Martha Karolyi always said, you compete as well as how you prepare. If you watched videos of podium training or the selection camp, the team did just that.
A few things stood out from the video that USAG and NBC Sports produced on the selection camp. There was a tremendous amount of editing. The vault did not have a hard surface to practice meet landings. And they went with gymnasts who could score well; they did not go with gymnasts who displayed consistency.
Skye Blakely is a wonderful talent. I rooted for her to make this team and hoped she could even do all four events. She has the potential to be world class. She is also returning from an Achilles injury and is not on the Courtney Kupets recovery timeline. She bombed day 1 of the selection camp and hit on day 2. This is relatively consistent with how she performed at Nationals. In selecting Skye, the national team essentially announced to the national team that you have to show you CAN hit your routines, but not that you WILL hit your routines.
If you have ever watched the documentary ‘Gymnast’ about Great Britain’s selection process in 2008, they selected athletes who could sometimes hit, not gymnasts who would hit. And the results followed.
Joscelyn Roberson I had had a rough trip to the World Championships. She appears to have reinjured her ankles and her back (expected given her excessive lordosis which is responsible for the line and lack of flexibility she is criticized for).
Who is USA Gymnastics even developing? Classics and Nationals had incredibly weak showings. And the depth is not encouraging if you count out potential comebacks from Olympians or NCAA athletes. If the team is going to succeed in the future, they need to rely on comebacks from Jordan Chiles, Jade Carey, Konnor McClain and girls who find their footing in college.
How can a national team culture even be successful when the girls who are relevant in March are never relevant in the summer? That isn’t just because collegiate athletes are staying around longer. It’s also a result of the ineffective culture of the current women’s elite program. And this isn’t new – this is something that Simone Biles and her teammates were masking over the last four years.
No one is advocating for abuse. But there needs to be standards and expectations. Otherwise, this performance is something that everyone should grow accustomed to. And it wasn’t even a strong field."
 
This is simply another person, likely not a coach, conflating abuse and expertise.

The problem stems from coaches with very high expertise but who also employ some sort of abuse to force their gymnasts to follow thier expert advice (which is a lack of expertise in psychology, really).

In the beginning of the Soviet/Eastern European influx of coaches to the West, these coches regularly outperformed other coaches, whether they were abusive or not. That is, their gymnasts got the best results.

Unfortunately, many, many stakeholders including other "local" coaches, looked at these results, and having almost zero clue about the expertise involved in getting those results, drew the conclusion that abuse - being abrasive, threatening, etc - was the key difference.

It wasn't.

But no-one noticed the Eastern European coaches who were not abusive and also got results, because years of propaganda made it just "common sense" that anyone from Eastern Europe was at least a little abusive - they were Communists after all!

In fact, these Eastern European coaches simply on average had far better expertise than Western coaches. (I'm talking both generally and about the 1990s. Now there are many great Western coaches with expertise just as high.)

Furthermore, the culture for abuse already existed in the West. You see it all over even pop culture. Just think of the imo( hideous) song Believer - this is what it is preaching:

....Seeing the beauty through the...
Pain!
You made me a, you made me a believer, believer
Pain!
You break me down and build me up, believer, believer
Pain!
Oh, let the bullets fly, oh, let them rain
My life, my love, my drive, it came from...
Pain!

No pain? Then no life, no love, no drive!

So, there is an underlying culture in no way exclusive to gymnastics or even sport, that is telling people pain is the true path to success. Compete with a frcture! Put up with your abusive coach! That is the price! But pain (psysical or mental) is not the same as sacrifice and discipline.

Sacrifice and discipline under the guidance of an expert coach get results. And there are plenty of examples of humane coaches who do not employ abuse and get very good results internationally.

The author of the above opinion is wrong to say:

(USA's poor showing in Jakarta) is a result of the ineffective culture of the current women’s elite program.

Because the term "ineffective culture" really means nothing at all.

And they immedaitely follow that by saying:

No one is advocating for abuse. But ...

But what? Why the need to put up that defence right away? Very telling. Is the author trying to say they don't advocate abuse, but that what a lot of people claim is abuse actually isn't? What is going on here?

Together with the "but" the author says:

No one is advocating for abuse. But there needs to be standards and expectations.

And so we have come to the conflation: on the one hand "no to abuse" and on the other hand "but standards and expectations!" when in fact what is lost in the author's argument is that standards and expectations are simply better expertise. And that is the point the author should have been trying to make.
 

Gymnaverse was created from WWgym!

Join today & you can REMOVE the ads for FREE!

Back