MDJDS competes a Nabz

Talk Gymnastics With Us!

Join Today... Members See FEWER Ads

It’s a giant swing 1/2 turn that sets up the dismount . It doesn’t really serve any purpose other than to turn the gymnast in the right direction for the dismount , hence the “orphan” .
 
Last edited:
Agreed; which is why I’ll scream from the rooftops that an open-ended COP demands individual skill values not handicapped by archaic letter groups. VT values have finally seemed to stabilize in a logical fashion, and there’s no reason a release, for ex, couldn’t be assigned a value by adding these to a base #:
  1. Entry: Swing (0), Toe-On (+.05), Stalder (+.10), Free-Hip (.15), Piked Stalder (+.20)
  2. Position: Tuck (0), Straddle (+.05), Pike (+.10), Layout (+.15)
  3. Turn: 1/2 (+.05), 1/1 (+.10), 1.5 (+1.5)
Subjective/manual decisions will always be required, but it’s more objective and moves the sport away from instances like: Tkatchev, Ray = D; Pike Tkatchev, Church = E; Tweddle = F; Nabieva = H; Nabieva 1/2 = H?

WTC is always so random - is a toe-on entry worth raising a skill’s value or not? But, I don’t mind a late turn + Ezhova counting for CR. The spirit of the CR should, IMO, be to show a variety of directions via grip changes and that’d be accomplished.

That so few athletes complete an actual Barani that passes vertical vs.a sideways / straddle-back 1/2 is another story.
 

Talk Gymnastics With Us!

Join Today... Members See FEWER Ads

Upcoming events

Back