- Feb 10, 2021
- 7,383
- 9,279
So they bonus system is in place to encourage athletes to do the difficulty needed to be successful internationally and compete for a team medal. Despite having strong teams, the US Men simply lacked the start values necessary.Stupid question alert (because I don’t follow MAG very heavily)
It seems that due to the US bonus system some athletes are getting 1-3 points in bonus. Is there any concern that the bonus system could result in selecting the wrong athletes for an international team?
I guess nationals scoring (which seems to overlook some execution errors) could cause the same issues anyways.
In the past athletes would not put difficult skills in because they were too risky and a major mistake on it would drop down in the standings. So they left these skills out…playing it safe isn’t enough to win a medal.
So to convince gymnasts to do the difficulty the points system was put in place to reward those gymnasts attempting the difficulty. Even if there are errors on a skill, at least it was performed, and with the bonus points in place doesn’t damage their overall score too harshly.
That said, USAG has both standings WITH the bonus and standings WITHOUT the bonus. They will pick the teams based off of WITHOUT bonus, that said, those doing the difficult skills well are getting the bonus AND scoring well when the bonus is taken away due to the D score being higher than it would normally.
Does that make sense?
I think it was the right move to make because USA MAG needed to change something in order to change the results. I think they have a strong chance to make it into the top 3 this year at Worlds of course without Russia present that helps tremendously. The added difficulty will also help, with the hope that witht he athletes performing the harder skills more, that they get more consistent with them.