Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The fall is a result of the lack of height and also precision so I would go .1+.1+1.0= 1.2 deductionQuestion for the judges. Would you take -.1 for height on the punch front in this pass, or would you feel that’s “double-dipping” since the fall implies a lack of height?
It was super close to not getting to her feet!For the front tuck, I’d deduct .3 height, .1 foot form, .1 leg separation and 1.0 fall.
@irichluck21 because she lands feet first you must credit the element, however the gymnast does not receive CV.
It should receive bonus tenths for Risk, Originality, and Virtuosity.I guess if you fall like karpenko you wouldn’t take a height deduction tho?