We are pretty much in agreement, I think the only difference is you are coming from it as a true UGA fan versus a random observer. If I put myself in your shoes I would be happy and optimistic about the co-head coach experiment so far. Certainly, there is no reason right now to say it won't work. As I said, they are to be commended for bringing some consistency to the line-ups. I slightly disagree on your top 10, although I again understand as a starved fan it feels amazing. But top 10 is definitely the floor for a program like Georgia, after all, if CKC was producing top 10 teams, would she have been let go?
An honest hypothetical question, what if in 3-4 years this is as far as they climb? How long do they get before critcism sets in or in another way, what is the Georgia's fan definition of program success? Lets say they make top 8 nationals one year (definitely doable if they are hosting a regional in that time frame) but other years just outside or never advance to the final 4? I mean its probably question for all fan-bases. Like I am sure folks are frustrated with Rowland (small probably but enough) and Jordan at Arkansas is what 6 years in with objectively little to show. We all hear the chatter about year 3 at Bama. What do you define a coaching staff and a successful program?
