2024 Week 12 Conference Championships Saturday, March 23.

Talk Gymnastics With Us!

Join Today... Members See FEWER Ads

GEC session 2
Penn in the lead with Yale .5 behind.
West Chester and Brown .4 behind Yale.
Those last two trying to keep pace with SCSU.
 
MPSF at half time. UC Davis has the surprising lead. But it is close from Southern Utah (.2). Sac. St. holding on.
Southern Utah had a fall on bars that they dropped.
1711234383932.png
 
Big Ten Final:

Michigan State 197.600
Minnesota 197.500
Michigan 197.225
Ohio State 197.00
Maryland 196.775
Illinois 196.700
Nebraska 196.250
Penn State 195.825
Rutgers 195.400
Iowa 193.975

Schulte wins the AA with 39.600
 
Per Spencer:

Ohio State has set the mark at 197.110 in 16th place.
To pass Ohio State, NC State would need to score 197.525 today.
To pass Ohio State, Oregon State would need to score 196.925 today.
 
Michigan State well deserved 1st ever conference championship win.

Minnesota was the best performance overall tonight and came soooooo close. 1 stuck vault could have made the difference.
 
And, can an NCAA judging expert answer a question for me? Are the rules regarding crediting an acro series the same as in the Developmental Program? I watched a gymnast in the EAGL event perform a forward aerial with a balance error, she then repeated and connected to another forward aerial (so the third of the same skill). She was given a 10,0 SV. Should the 3° forward aerial have received no value, thus negating the acro series?
 
The 3rd aerial would not count toward start value, but the connection would count for the acro series.
 
ACC after 1
Clemson 49.225 (avoids a fall UB)
UNC 49.225! (FX)
NC State 49.150 (VT)
Pitt 49.050 (BB)
 
What an exciting meet! Glad to see MSU pull it out, what a nail biter!

Also, watching a meet without the scoring tower right after one while having the scoring tower on the side, I found myself saying "what are the scores?!?" About every 15 seconds
 
The 3rd aerial would not count toward start value, but the connection would count for the acro series.
Thanks. Where in the NCAA rule modifications document is this exemption found? I have read the section regarding difference (with the exception of VT SV) from the Developmental Program, and cannot find this. In the DP COP they use the example of a BHS that falls but receives a DV, and then has a BHS + BHS connection where the first of the series has a DV but the 2° does not (due to the 3° time same element) and they do not award an acro series.
 

Talk Gymnastics With Us!

Join Today... Members See FEWER Ads

Upcoming events

Back