- Feb 3, 2021
- 1,806
- 2,532
Clarification: I am not saying I want rules that lead to routines like this. I am just saying this strategy would improve things. Even better rules would lead to even better routines, though.
The data has been here for over 10 years: the E-score outweighs the D-score in terms of importance.
But, generally speaking, except maybe on uneven bars, gymnasts and coaches keep showing up with deduction-ridden exercises overloaded with extra elements that also get deducted.
The balance beam champion was okay, but she isn’t a particular great beamer — there were many others were more capable. Yet the easiest sets (and shortest sets) got the top scores in beam finals (Kovacs being an exception).
I genuinely believe that a change of strategy — shorter routines with lower D-scores with more repetition and confidence in the training gym — could vastly improve the gymnastics we see.
Why don’t gymnasts and coaches “get” this? What will need to happen for them to break the inertia?
The data has been here for over 10 years: the E-score outweighs the D-score in terms of importance.
But, generally speaking, except maybe on uneven bars, gymnasts and coaches keep showing up with deduction-ridden exercises overloaded with extra elements that also get deducted.
The balance beam champion was okay, but she isn’t a particular great beamer — there were many others were more capable. Yet the easiest sets (and shortest sets) got the top scores in beam finals (Kovacs being an exception).
I genuinely believe that a change of strategy — shorter routines with lower D-scores with more repetition and confidence in the training gym — could vastly improve the gymnastics we see.
Why don’t gymnasts and coaches “get” this? What will need to happen for them to break the inertia?
Last edited: