- Jan 31, 2021
- 564
- 811
A women's NCAA judge was interviewed on Gymcastic
tinyurl.com
I normally don't listen to that show but for some reason listened to this episode.
45:17 – Judge Jason Buttons Interview Begins
46:00 – “They Don’t Know What They’re Doing”
47:03 – Skill Recognition Problems at the Judges’ Table
48:46 – Why Club Judges Can Talk and College Judges Can’t
50:17 – Why Judges Need Replay and Slow Motion
51:11 – Why So Many Top Judges Avoid College Meets
53:09 – Accountability, Testing & Why Bad Judges Shouldn’t Stay
56:18 – How Often Judging Errors Happen
57:52 – Deductions Judges Are Getting Wrong
01:00:06 – Why Routine Summaries Don’t Really Explain Enough
01:05:34 – How Judges Are Evaluated and Why It’s Not Working
01:07:15 – Why NCAA Judging Pay and Conditions Are a Problem
01:08:35 – Are Judges Actually Biased?
01:10:03 – Is There Any Real Data on Who the Best Judges Are?
01:11:16 – How Jason Would Fix the Entire Judging System
01:14:42 – Why Most Judges Still Love the Sport
01:16:24 – Judging Pay, Travel Time & Dry Cleaning Reality
01:20:24 – Interview Wrap-Up
NWGJA isn't happy and he's probably going to get some "feedback".
I wasn't too impressed with the way he came across. He's been a judge for 4 years and admitted that when he was a coach he just kind of accepted the scores.
Starting out with “They Don’t Know What They’re Doing” is not a good look. I'm sure some people don't, but this makes it sound like the problem is widespread.
I don't pay much attention to the women's NCAA, so I have no idea.
The men's judges aren't perfect. There have been D scores off by a whole point, resulting in someone making an event final. It sounds like some of the problems are similar - not enough continuing education, low pay so NCAA doesn't get the best judges, and some people who really don't know what they are doing.
Judge Breaks Silence: "There’s no real accountability system"
A judge reveals why NCAA gymnastics scoring is inconsistent. Plus: conference champions, regionals draw chaos, and who has the toughest path.
tinyurl.com
I normally don't listen to that show but for some reason listened to this episode.
45:17 – Judge Jason Buttons Interview Begins
46:00 – “They Don’t Know What They’re Doing”
47:03 – Skill Recognition Problems at the Judges’ Table
48:46 – Why Club Judges Can Talk and College Judges Can’t
50:17 – Why Judges Need Replay and Slow Motion
51:11 – Why So Many Top Judges Avoid College Meets
53:09 – Accountability, Testing & Why Bad Judges Shouldn’t Stay
56:18 – How Often Judging Errors Happen
57:52 – Deductions Judges Are Getting Wrong
01:00:06 – Why Routine Summaries Don’t Really Explain Enough
01:05:34 – How Judges Are Evaluated and Why It’s Not Working
01:07:15 – Why NCAA Judging Pay and Conditions Are a Problem
01:08:35 – Are Judges Actually Biased?
01:10:03 – Is There Any Real Data on Who the Best Judges Are?
01:11:16 – How Jason Would Fix the Entire Judging System
01:14:42 – Why Most Judges Still Love the Sport
01:16:24 – Judging Pay, Travel Time & Dry Cleaning Reality
01:20:24 – Interview Wrap-Up
NWGJA isn't happy and he's probably going to get some "feedback".
I wasn't too impressed with the way he came across. He's been a judge for 4 years and admitted that when he was a coach he just kind of accepted the scores.
Starting out with “They Don’t Know What They’re Doing” is not a good look. I'm sure some people don't, but this makes it sound like the problem is widespread.
I don't pay much attention to the women's NCAA, so I have no idea.
The men's judges aren't perfect. There have been D scores off by a whole point, resulting in someone making an event final. It sounds like some of the problems are similar - not enough continuing education, low pay so NCAA doesn't get the best judges, and some people who really don't know what they are doing.
