Preview of 2025 NCAA Season - SEC conference

Talk Gymnastics With Us!

Join Today... Members See FEWER Ads

cuuf

Member
Joined
Mar 23, 2022
Messages
388
Reaction score
353
The NCAA season is less than a month away, I think it's safe to say that the next NCAA title will probably come from this conference, so I thought I would preview the teams and opine who might win the conference—

My Take:​

In general, I am not putting too much weight into highly ranked freshman as major contributors/difference makers. History has shown that there might be only a handful that will be significant for a few teams but on balance they spend the first year, adjusting and spot duty. That is not to say they won't make the team better, I just don't think one can base a team's performance solely on a strong freshman group.

Group 1 (In finishing order) - LSU, Oklahoma, Florida
I believe if OU did not have the bizarre collapse last year, this year was supposed to be LSU's year of firsts, so they might get 2 for one, so to speak. Not only do they have a whopping 10 seniors, the majority of the seniors are the primary contributors and just enough underclassmen talent to augment those seniors. Plus LSU gets Florida and OU at home which is going to be bonkers scoring nights. OU will feel the pain of losing Ragan and Kat even with a competition-ready group of freshmen. Florida would be in better shape if not dealing with the two Achilles tears, although I expect they might be contributing in some way at the end of the season. They also have to go to OU and LSU.
Group 2 - Missouri, Arkansas, Georgia
Missouri is probably my stretch here. I am leaning on a veteran group (8 seniors), coupled with the surprising return of Helen Hu to lead a solid growth in scoring. Arkansas, I expect more of the solid, steady growth that Jordyn has shown over the last 5 years. I don't see any significant loses and getting Waligora from Bama and Roberson, who is going to be one of those freshman exception contributors, is my reason for this placement. Georgia is a bit of a wild-card. They have no senior leadership to provide a steadying guiding influence for a largely underclassman team. This could be problematic given all the changes and its impact on team chemistry (Kara Eaker back after a year off, several extra transfers, girls unsure who are going to be one of the 4 cut at the end of the season, new co-head coach). I am hearing mixed things about the team that give me pause. Still they have a talented group of youth particularly that sophomore class which should carry them. I am not completely sold on the co-head coach approach though, so it will be interesting to watch this season.
Group 3 - Auburn, Alabama, Kentucky
Auburn could easily slide up to that second group (Honestly everyone in Group 2 and 3 could change places, I just had to pick). They have a very strong freshman class and a large experienced senior group. Bama, I was surprised compiling this list, has really lost a lot of contributing talent. I think Ashley's group is going to slide back a little as they continue to install their culture or Bamaly as they like to call it. They will be fine down the road, but this year will be growth. Finally Kentucky cannot just replace the queen Worley. Kinda like Bama, except it is just a matter of reloading talent versus adjusting to a new culture.

Overall, this conference is loaded top to bottom. I mean really, who do you pick to finish last?! I do think LSU, OU and Florida are just in a slightly different category. Storylines I am interested in? 1. Georgia, do they surprise everyone or do they struggle to adjust with new coaching and team chemistry? 2. LSU, does Jay look ahead to next year when the losses will be significant and balance giving a talented, but unproven group of underclassmen experience or will he just keep business as usual? 3. How does OU respond not only to the bitter taste to how they ended the season but also the new conference?
 
Looking at UCLA. The biggest reason for hope is they get Jordan Chiles back which should negate the loss of Selena Harris. Still, Jordan alone does not push them further ahead. They have a relatively large senior class, so leadership shouldn't be questioned. Overall, they should be in the thick of it for B10 title although without digging too deep my gut tells me Mich State is the favorite there. I see them getting into post-season but borderline to get to nationals. Questions heading into the season: 1. Same as every year it seems, will they stay healthy and perform up to their potential? They have the talent but every year, but it seems either injury or just in-opportune mistakes hold them back. 2. How do they adjust to the cross-country competitions; does that make any impact? I think it won't make much of a difference, but we won't know till we know. 3. Does the freshman class make a difference? Last year only Katelyn Rosen made a real impact. Does one or even two of the freshmen perform up to that level? If so it could be the difference maker.

Avg197.35
# of Seniors7
Key LossesSelena Harris39.643 AA
Chae Campbell38.425 AA
Marz Frazier9.85 Fl, B
Nya Reed9.85 Vt, Fl
Key GainsMacy McGowan
4-5 starsSasha Fujisaka
Camryn Richarson
Mika Webster-Longin
Jordan ChilesRtn Defer
 
Chae is taking her Covid year, so she’s in and looking very good
That's correct, my oversight, nonetheless I still do not think it changes their outlook.
 
Last edited:
Looking at UCLA. The biggest reason for hope is they get Jordan Chiles back which should negate the loss of Selena Harris. Still, Jordan alone does not push them further ahead. They have a relatively large senior class, so leadership shouldn't be questioned. Overall, they should be in the thick of it for B10 title although without digging too deep my gut tells me Mich State is the favorite there. I see them getting into post-season but borderline to get to nationals. Questions heading into the season: 1. Same as every year it seems, will they stay healthy and perform up to their potential? They have the talent but every year, but it seems either injury or just in-opportune mistakes hold them back. 2. How do they adjust to the cross-country competitions; does that make any impact? I think it won't make much of a difference, but we won't know till we know. 3. Does the freshman class make a difference? Last year only Katelyn Rosen made a real impact. Does one or even two of the freshmen perform up to that level? If so it could be the difference maker.

Avg197.35
# of Seniors7
Key LossesSelena Harris39.643 AA
Chae Campbell38.425 AA
Marz Frazier9.85 Fl, B
Nya Reed9.85 Vt, Fl
Key GainsMacy McGowan
4-5 starsSasha Fujisaka
Camryn Richarson
Mika Webster-Longin
Jordan ChilesRtn Defer
Is Chae Campbell no longer on the team? She's still on their roster.
 
Looking at UCLA. The biggest reason for hope is they get Jordan Chiles back which should negate the loss of Selena Harris. Still, Jordan alone does not push them further ahead. They have a relatively large senior class, so leadership shouldn't be questioned. Overall, they should be in the thick of it for B10 title although without digging too deep my gut tells me Mich State is the favorite there. I see them getting into post-season but borderline to get to nationals. Questions heading into the season: 1. Same as every year it seems, will they stay healthy and perform up to their potential? They have the talent but every year, but it seems either injury or just in-opportune mistakes hold them back. 2. How do they adjust to the cross-country competitions; does that make any impact? I think it won't make much of a difference, but we won't know till we know. 3. Does the freshman class make a difference? Last year only Katelyn Rosen made a real impact. Does one or even two of the freshmen perform up to that level? If so it could be the difference maker.

Avg197.35
# of Seniors7
Key LossesSelena Harris39.643 AA
Chae Campbell38.425 AA
Marz Frazier9.85 Fl, B
Nya Reed9.85 Vt, Fl
Key GainsMacy McGowan
4-5 starsSasha Fujisaka
Camryn Richarson
Mika Webster-Longin
Jordan ChilesRtn Defer
Complete agree with you here.

I think the extra cross country travel point you raise - and into harsher winter conditions - is a good one. I cant see it not having an impact by the end of the season. Whether that is increased illness throughout the season or being more tired come post season, it's hard to see them nailing that aspect of it in their first season.
 
UCLA looks to be much better conditioned and finally have the vaults to contend this year. Mark Freeman looks to be exactly what they needed. I’m so glad they finally hired a coach with an excellent technical background.
 

Talk Gymnastics With Us!

Join Today... Members See FEWER Ads

Upcoming events

Back